...
The RF1, PID, and PRD segments must echo what was received in the referral message (REF).
Note that the RRI may contain personally identified information, therefore the handling of the message must account for the potentially sensitive nature and that RF1, PID, PRD may be made optional in future versions for privacy reasons.
...
7.1.1 Purpose – section like 4.25 Delete message for reports and results needed for REF deletion (status markers already exists for ORU). RF1-1 has corrected values already incorporated into draft au Standard. Notes added to clarity: When a corrected referral snapshot is sent, all information from the previous snapshot identified by the same RF1-6 Originating referral identifier (EI) must be replaced with the current snapshot. e.g. Allergies, Medication, Results, etc.
...
- 57. @Vanessa Cameron to forward 1) RCPA SPIA 2) RACGP Standards re pathology messaging to HL7 O&O
- 58. @Andrew McIntyre & @Jared Davison to draft intended recipient content for HL7au Standard to align with RCPA SPIA & RACGP Standards
- 59. @Vanessa Cameron to email O&O members re current use of RF1, PID or PRD being used in ACK messages
- 60. @Vincent McCauley to check International Standard for reference to use of RF1, PID or PRD in ACK messages
- 61. @Tony Cruice to investigate if making changes to use of RF1, PID or PRD in ACK messages will break anyone’s systems
- 62. @Vanessa Cameron asked to approach RCPA for advice on their intent re HL7 O&O membership going forward
- 63. @ Tony Cruice to draft additional comment for deletions made to 7. Patient Referral
...