2016-09-27 Meeting notes

1. 1. confirm the suggested individual sub-conformance points be created as part of a CP.
   2. Discuss the identification of the CP ie using URI and/or oids –
   3. refer to comment initiated by Donna Moore “Conformance points should have a single rule, some of the above conformance points have multiple statements.”
   4. presenjtation of metadata eg "Sender, Receiver or both, plus is there any other metadata to be considered?

• Decision is to number in standard way as per the rest of the document for the time being, i.e. each conformance points will be 1, 2 and sub-conformance points will be  1.1, 2.1,etc..

• Former user (Deleted) will write to the HL7 Australia TSC group to ask for advice on using either/both OID or URI for these conformance/sub-conformance points.

1. 1. How many layers ie links to sub pages should the document have?  There are some long pages.
   2. Is it meant to be in a printable format?

Observation Ordering:

• Confirm the deletion of content that is not part of the Australian context eg

  • 4.4.3 OSQ/OSR- query response for order status (event Q06)  

  • 4.4.4 OMG - general clinical order message (event O19)

  • etc ie the tagged/commented sections.

CP #6

David McKillop

To be discussed ie

• leave where is
• add to new CP on Display segment below
• create a new CP

Observation ordering & Observation reporting:

Check the comments in the ORM & ORU about the segments that are "Not to be used in the Australian context"

• conform new content relating to :
  • ignoring new message types of OMG^O19, ORG^O20, OML^O21, ORL^O22, OUL^R21
  • keep using the following message types ORM^O01, ORU^R01, ORR^O02, ACK^R01 and ACK.
• In the "General Segments" section:
  • query delete the reference to BLG; OR
  • add the detail on the BLG segment??
  • Query add any detail on any other segmetns???